Dear Supporter of Digital Freedom,
Copyright law is already too complicated and frustrating. We
need to tell Congress not to make it even more so.
The House of Representatives recently passed a bill that
combined the Music Modernization Act with the CLASSICS Act.
While the Music Modernization Act generally does a good job
of helping songwriters get paid for online streaming, the
CLASSICS Act simply creates new barriers for lovers of old
music. You can learn more here:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/music-modernization-act-good-solution…
The Senate's version of this combined bill, S. 2823, was
recently introduced.
S. 2823 would extend some cherry-picked parts of federal
copyright to cover sound recordings made between 1923 and
1972, which are currently covered only by a patchwork of
state laws. It would force streaming services to get
licenses for those recordings, even though all that does is
create a new subsidy for rightsholders (which are usually
record labels and not artists) and make it harder for music
fans to listen to old recordings.
In the case of truly old recordings, finding the
rightsholder could be so difficult that recordings that hold
a mostly historical value would simply disappear from
streaming services, unless one wishes to chance an heir
showing up out of the woodwork, bringing a claim, and facing
massive, unpredictable copyright penalties in court.
There is no public benefit to this part of S. 2823, so tell
your senators to vote no on it by going here: https://act.eff.org/action/stop-another-expansion-of-copyright-tell-the-sen…
Thank you,
Katharine Trendacosta
Activism Team
Electronic Frontier Foundation, 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109 USA EFF appreciates your support and respects your privacy: https://www.eff.org/policy Unsubscribe from all mailings: https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=59122&qid=841… Change your email preferences: https://supporters.eff.org/update-your-preferences?cid1=2061725&cs=22c4cc28…
Moin,
auf dem Freifunk Festival letztes Jahr bot einer von FFNW mir für Freifunk Kiel Transit und IPv6 Konnektivität an.
Steht das Angebot noch, bzw. wie sähe das Konkret aus?
Viele Grüße,
Moritz Fago
Hallo zusammen,
aktuell gibt es weiterhin Probleme mit dem Routing zwischen Frankfurt und Berlin.
Auch nach 7 Stunden debugging konnte ich nichts feststellen und habe nun ein entsprechendes Ticket bei einem unserer Carrier aufgemacht.
Bis dahin sind das Riot, die Map sowie die Website down.
Wir versuchen unser bestes alles wieder online zu bekommen, können nur grade recht wenig machen. Sobald alles wieder läuft, geben wir Bescheid.
Viele Grüße
Stefan
_______ _______ _______
(_______)(_______)(_______) _
_____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _| |_ ___ ____
| ___) | ___) | ___)| ___ | / ___)(_ _)/ _ \ / ___)
| |_____ | | | | | ____|( (___ | |_| |_| || |
|_______)|_| |_| |_____) \____) \__)\___/ |_|
EFFector Vol. 31, No. 7 Monday, May 7, 2018 editor(a)eff.org
A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation
ISSN 1062-9424
effector: n, Computer Sci. A device for producing a
desired change.
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
In our 733rd issue:
* Red Alert: Tell Congress to Use the Congressional Review Act to Restore the Open Internet Order
In December, the FCC voted to end the 2015 Open Internet Order, which
prevented Internet service providers (ISPs) like AT&T and Comcast from
violating net neutrality principles. A simple majority vote in Congress can
keep the FCC’s decision from going into effect. From now until the Senate
votes, EFF, along with a coalition of organizations, companies, and websites,
is on red alert and calling on you to tell Congress to vote to restore the
Open Internet Order.
Read more: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/red-alert-net-neutralirty-tell-congre…
* Bring in the Nerds: EFF Introduces Actual Encryption Experts to U.S. Senate Staff
On May 3, in the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center, EFF convened a closed-door
briefing for Senate staff about the realities of device encryption. While
policymakers hear frequently from the FBI and the Department of Justice about
the dangers of encryption and the so-called Going Dark problem, they very
rarely hear from actual engineers, cryptographers, and computer scientists.
EFF's panelists included Dr. Matt Blaze, professor of computer science at the
University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Susan Landau, professor of cybersecurity and
policy at Tufts University; Erik Neuenschwander, Apple’s manager of user
privacy; and EFF’s tech policy director Dr. Jeremy Gillula.
The discussion focused on renewed calls by the FBI and DOJ to create
mechanisms to enable “exceptional access” to encrypted devices. Our goal
was to give a technical description of how device encryption actually works
and answer staff questions about the risks that exceptional access mechanisms
necessarily introduce into the ecosystem. EFF's Gillula went last and
concluded that in the cat-and-mouse game that is computer security, mandating
exceptional access would freeze the defenders’ state of the art, while
allowing attackers to progress without limit.
Read more: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/bring-nerds-eff-introduces-actual-enc…
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
EFF Updates
* A Tale of Two Poorly Designed Cross-Border Data Access Regimes
Recently, the European Commission published two legislative proposals that
could further cement an unfortunate trend towards privacy erosion in
cross-border state investigations. Building on a foundation first
established by the recently enacted U.S. CLOUD Act, these proposals compel
tech companies and service providers to ignore critical privacy obligations
in order to facilitate easy access when facing data requests from foreign
governments. These initiatives collectively signal the increasing willingness
of states to sacrifice privacy as a way of addressing pragmatic challenges in
cross-border access that could be better solved with more training and
streamlined processes.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/04/tale-two-poorly-designed-cross-border…
* Math Can’t Solve Everything: Questions We Need To Be Asking Before Deciding an Algorithm is the Answer
Before rushing to employ algorithms to make decisions, companies should begin
by asking five questions:
1) Will this algorithm influence—or serve as the basis of—decisions with
the potential to negatively impact people’s lives?
2) Can the available data actually lead to a good outcome?
3) Is the algorithm fair?
4) How will the results (really) be used by humans?
5) Will people affected by these decisions have any influence over the
system?
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/math-cant-solve-everything-questions-…
* Why Am I Getting All These Terms of Service Update Emails?
Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force on May
25th, and most companies that have users in Europe are scrambling to update
their privacy policies and terms of service to avoid breaking this new EU
law. It's still an open question whether the rules apply to users living
outside the EU, but the changes involve refinements in terminology, how
companies need to get permission to use data, and changes in user ability to
look at the data itself, change it, and take it with them when they leave.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/why-am-i-getting-all-these-terms-serv…
* The Big Lie ISPs Are Spreading in State Legislatures Is That They Don’t Make Enough Money
ISPs claim that the net neutrality principle banning paid
prioritization—where an ISP charges websites and applications new fees and
relegate those that do not pay to the slow lane—means that they cannot make
enough money to upgrade and extend their service. We know this isn't true
because the majority of costs for ISPs are in the initial building of their
networks, which they have already recouped. And we've recently seen new ISPs
build high-speed Internet networks turn a profit relatively quickly while
adhering to net neutrality.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/big-lie-isps-are-spreading-state-legi…
* Mashup Maker: Another Entry for the Catalog of Missing Devices From an EFF Supporter
Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act makes tampering with
"Digital Rights Management" a legal no-go zone. This scares off inventors and
tinkerers from building new tools that should be perfectly legal. EFF details
examples of these non-existent technologies in the Catalogue of Missing
Devices. EFF supporter Benjamin McLean offered up his "Mashup Maker" as an
example. This program would have ripped tracks legally acquired and imported
them into a personal library with a built-in editor, making it easier for
people to make fair use of these tracks.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/mashup-maker-another-entry-catalog-mi…
* There is No Middle Ground on Encryption
Government officials are once again insisting that they still need to
compromise our security via a backdoor for law enforcement. Opponents of
encryption imagine that there is a “middle ground” approach that allows
for strong encryption but with “exceptional access” for law enforcement.
Government officials claim that technology companies are creating a world
where people can commit crimes without fear of detection.
Despite this renewed rhetoric, most experts continue to agree that
exceptional access, no matter how you implement it, weakens security. The
terminology might have changed, but the essential question has not: should
technology companies be forced to develop a system that inherently harms
their users? The answer hasn’t changed either: no.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/there-no-middle-ground-encryption
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
Announcements
* Certbot Hackathon in Cleveland, OH
Are you coming to PyCon? Join our development sprint to help improve Certbot,
the easy-to-use client that fetches and deploys SSL/TLS certificates from
Let's Encrypt.
https://www.eff.org/event/pycon-certbot-development-sprint
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
Job Openings
* Member Outreach Assistant
We're looking for an energetic Member Outreach Assistant to support EFF's
fundraising operations and help build relationships with our growing
community.
https://www.eff.org/opportunities/jobs/member-outreach-assistant
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
MiniLinks
- License Plate Surveillance Prompts New Concerns About Your Privacy
Unrestrained, unmonitored sharing of data collected by automated license
plate readers is a threat to privacy and public safety. (NBC San Diego)
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/License-Plate-Surveillance-Prompts-N…
- Technology turns our cities into spies for ICE, whether we like it or not
Local law enforcement and other city agencies have been deploying spy
technology that's "hurtling toward us so fast that privacy laws can't keep
up." We need to fight back. (LA Times)
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-farivar-surveillance-tech-201805…
- Once Again, Activists Must Beg the Government to Preserve the Right to Repair
This year's "excruciating DMCA section 1201 exemption process" threatens the
right to repair tractors, cars, and electronics is at stake. (Motherboard)
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mbxzyv/dmca-1201-exemptions
- ISPs should charge for fast lanes—just like TSA Precheck, GOP lawmaker says
In a way, Representative Marsha Blackburn is right that paid prioritization
is like TSA Precheck. In that everyone else is stuck in a slow lane while
those with money get to breeze past them. (Ars Technica)
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/04/isps-should-charge-for-fast-lan…
- As the Number of Driverless Cars Increase, So Does the Need for Car Maker Transparency
Self-driving car companies may not want to share accident data out of fear it
will help competitors to progress faster. But the trade-off is a higher level
of safety—and its a trade-off we should demand they make. (Los Angeles)
http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-driverless-data-20180430-sto…
- Halifax police won't charge teen arrested in Nova Scotia privacy breach
Excellent news: Canadian police have dropped computer hacking charges against
a 19-year-old who downloaded openly available information from a public
records website. (CBC)
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/police-drop-charges-in-nova-scoti…
- Oakland to require public approval of surveillance tech
We must assure that there is transparency when cities allow police to acquire
or use surveillance technology. On May 1, Oakland City Council voted in
support of an important proposed Surveillance and Community Safety Ordinance
to do just that. (East Bay Times)
https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2018/05/02/oakland-to-require-public-approval-…
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
-------- SUPPORTED BY DONORS
-------------------------------------------------
Our members make it possible for EFF to bring legal and technological
expertise into crucial battles about online rights. Whether defending free
speech online or challenging unconstitutional surveillance, your
participation makes a difference. Every donation gives technology users who
value freedom online a stronger voice and more formidable advocate.
If you aren't already, please consider becoming an EFF member today.
https://supporters.eff.org/join/effector
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
* Administrivia
Editor:
Katharine Trendacosta, Policy Analyst editor(a)eff.org
EFFector is published by:
The Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://www.eff.org/
Membership & donation queries:
membership(a)eff.org
General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:
info(a)eff.org
Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is
encouraged. MiniLinks do not necessarily represent
the views of EFF.
Back issues of EFFector are available via the Web at:
https://www.eff.org/effector/
Unsubscribe from future mailings or change your email preferences: https://supporters.eff.org/update-your-preferences?cid1=2061725&cs=fe822fe8…
Opt out of all EFF email: https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=58646&qid=836…
815 Eddy Street
San Francisco, CA 94109-7701
United States
Hallo zusammen,
das Riot sowie die Map sind bis auf weiteres außer Betrieb, da es dort routing Probleme zwischen den Standorten gibt.
Sobald ich Zeit finde, repariere ich es.
Stefan
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Moin,
kann es sein dass es ein Problem in der Default-Hood gibt?
scheint hauptsächlich ein IPv4 problem zu sein. Aber die v6-Verbindung
ist auch sehr schmalbandig.
lg
Malte
traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 10.18.1.13 (10.18.1.13) 24.671 ms 25.866 ms 26.291 ms
2 10.18.1.5 (10.18.1.5) 39.413 ms 39.490 ms 39.846 ms
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 *^C
traceroute to google.de (2a00:1450:400e:808::2003), 30 hops max, 80 byte
packets
1 fd74:fdaa:9dc4:113::1 (fd74:fdaa:9dc4:113::1) 23.517 ms 23.755 ms
24.269 ms
2 fd74:fdaa:9dc4:105::1 (fd74:fdaa:9dc4:105::1) 37.843 ms 38.309 ms
40.358 ms
3 2a03:2260::1 (2a03:2260::1) 64.947 ms 67.359 ms 67.341 ms
4 2a03:2260::2 (2a03:2260::2) 67.301 ms 67.267 ms 67.559 ms
5 2001:4860:1:1::9e6 (2001:4860:1:1::9e6) 67.500 ms 67.417 ms
67.420 ms
6 2a00:1450:8000:274::1:1 (2a00:1450:8000:274::1:1) 67.046 ms
2a00:1450:8000:223::1:1 (2a00:1450:8000:223::1:1) 47.850 ms 42.086 ms
7 2001:4860:0:1::692 (2001:4860:0:1::692) 45.703 ms
2001:4860:0:1::1956 (2001:4860:0:1::1956) 43.647 ms 44.648 ms
8 2001:4860:0:11df::10 (2001:4860:0:11df::10) 44.980 ms
2001:4860:0:11e1::e (2001:4860:0:11e1::e) 46.182 ms
2001:4860:0:11df::11 (2001:4860:0:11df::11) 47.488 ms
9 2001:4860::c:4000:f873 (2001:4860::c:4000:f873) 48.033 ms 48.526
ms 2001:4860::8:0:cb93 (2001:4860::8:0:cb93) 53.948 ms
10 2001:4860::c:4000:d9a9 (2001:4860::c:4000:d9a9) 67.063 ms
2607:f8b0:e000:8000::4 (2607:f8b0:e000:8000::4) 53.974 ms 55.223 ms
11 2607:f8b0:e000:8000::3 (2607:f8b0:e000:8000::3) 55.786 ms
2001:4860::1:0:cd13 (2001:4860::1:0:cd13) 54.907 ms 47.726 ms
12 2001:4860:0:1::17ed (2001:4860:0:1::17ed) 48.769 ms
2001:4860:0:f8c::1 (2001:4860:0:f8c::1) 50.359 ms 2001:4860:0:1::2157
(2001:4860:0:1::2157) 49.109 ms
13 2001:4860:0:1::17ed (2001:4860:0:1::17ed) 51.002 ms
2001:4860:0:1::2157 (2001:4860:0:1::2157) 50.189 ms 51.761 ms
14 ams16s31-in-x03.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400e:808::2003) 57.955 ms
56.923 ms 58.354 ms
Hallo zusammen,
momentan müssen wir dringende Wartungsarbeiten am Standort FRA durchführen.
Daher sind teilweise Dienste nicht erreichbar.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Hello,
Your certificate (or certificates) for the names listed below will expire in
1 days (on 03 May 18 18:23 +0000). Please make sure to renew
your certificate before then, or visitors to your website will encounter errors.
cloud.ffnw.de
dev.ffnw.de
firmware.ffnw.de
office.ffnw.de
For any questions or support, please visit https://community.letsencrypt.org/.
Unfortunately, we can't provide support by email.
For details about when we send these emails, please visit
https://letsencrypt.org/docs/expiration-emails/. In particular, note
that this reminder email is still sent if you've obtained a slightly
different certificate by adding or removing names. If you've replaced
this certificate with a newer one that covers more or fewer names than
the list above, you may be able to ignore this message.
If you want to stop receiving all email from this address, click
http://mandrillapp.com/track/unsub.php?u=30850198&id=863c5f2c66af48e9835f86…
(Warning: this is a one-click action that cannot be undone)
Regards,
The Let's Encrypt Team
Hello,
Your certificate (or certificates) for the names listed below will expire in
1 days (on 03 May 18 10:29 +0000). Please make sure to renew
your certificate before then, or visitors to your website will encounter errors.
netmon.ffnw.de
For any questions or support, please visit https://community.letsencrypt.org/.
Unfortunately, we can't provide support by email.
For details about when we send these emails, please visit
https://letsencrypt.org/docs/expiration-emails/. In particular, note
that this reminder email is still sent if you've obtained a slightly
different certificate by adding or removing names. If you've replaced
this certificate with a newer one that covers more or fewer names than
the list above, you may be able to ignore this message.
If you want to stop receiving all email from this address, click
http://mandrillapp.com/track/unsub.php?u=30850198&id=b297c60d97b04b13b3c109…
(Warning: this is a one-click action that cannot be undone)
Regards,
The Let's Encrypt Team